The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
A marketplace for chronographs, dive watches and other tool-type wristwatches and timepieces |
Please see our ChronoTrader Policies and Terms of Use. | Learn more about How To Include Photos In Your Postings. |
Rules: Postings must be an ad announcing an intent to sell, buy or trade. Full item description and photo(s) must be posted within the message here, not as links to other websites. Links to online auctions and other sites: Links to online auctions, dealer sites or other listings of items are permitted, but you should be careful to ensure that such listings will comply with our other ChronoTrader Policies. In addition, we request that sellers linking to online auctions or listings offer some benefit or accomodation to ChronoTrader readers (for example, some discount or an undertaking to end an auction early, to keep a watch "in the family"). Photos must be of the actual item for sale in its present condition. No counterfeit or replica products. No post for the same item may be repeated within 7 days, except to lower the asking price. Commercial dealers are limited to three unique posts per day. [More...]
: ====================================================
: Dear EZ
: I thought I would include link to a photo of a Vintage Omega
: Vintage Omega Seamaster 300 st 165.024
: Please have a look at this one and let us know if it is the same
: Cheers
: Will
: Seamaster 300 st 165.024
: The watch is being sold via Chronocentric.com and is a fairly
: recent entry.
: You may view the watch and details at:
: watch you bought.
Very much appreciate the support, Will.
The not-really-a-WatchCo that I bought from stilov was a 166.024 (date-version). I still have it, and if I were to sell it I'd disclose everything I know about it. I'll post-up pictures of the differences over the weekend when I can take some pictures.
This 165.024 that you referenced currently for sale looks like a fine example of a SM300. No argument with that watch or the seller.
Best to all,
-Ez
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |