The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998.
Informational Websites ChronoMaddox -- the legacy of Chuck Maddox OnTheDash -- vintage Heuer website Zowie -- Omega information
Discussion Forums ChronoMaddox Forum Heuer Forum Omega Forum
Counterfeit Watchers ChronoTools Forum ChronoTrader Forum

A marketplace for chronographs, dive watches and other tool-type wristwatches and timepieces

This forum is for BUYING, SELLING and TRADING only--not for discussing watches. Please limit postings to specific ads for buying, selling or trading watches, parts or accessories that that match at least one of the following categories:

Please see our ChronoTrader Policies and Terms of Use. Learn more about How To Include Photos In Your Postings.

Rules: Postings must be an ad announcing an intent to sell, buy or trade. Full item description and photo(s) must be posted within the message here, not as links to other websites. Links to online auctions and other sites: Links to online auctions, dealer sites or other listings of items are permitted, but you should be careful to ensure that such listings will comply with our other ChronoTrader Policies. In addition, we request that sellers linking to online auctions or listings offer some benefit or accomodation to ChronoTrader readers (for example, some discount or an undertaking to end an auction early, to keep a watch "in the family"). Photos must be of the actual item for sale in its present condition. No counterfeit or replica products. No post for the same item may be repeated within 7 days, except to lower the asking price. Commercial dealers are limited to three unique posts per day. [More...]

Re: And the photographic evidence...

Standards and perception varies widely among individuals.

It is also impossible to describe every single flaw on a watch. A thorough due diligence from buyer is always a must and should include a request for further images with hands set at different positions on dial.

Pointing out what seems like flaw that is a few thousands of an inch thick and barely perceptible in normal photos is, in my eyes, what I would consider nit picking ...

The seller, Is quite right not offer any partial refund. However, if the matter as reported immediately and based on terms of sale, he could offer a refund as long as item is returned at buyers expense and it is not tampered with or damaged.

: This is the original photo posted by the seller (re: my earlier
: transaction with him, not the one that he deleted above and is
: now on eBay). It is true that the dial shows plenty of patina,
: along with some scratches, and I was OK with it based on the
: photo.

: Be sure to note the position of the hour hand.


: Now look at what was hiding behind that hour hand. Surely just a
: coincidence, right?


: Would any of you feel comfortable with that, as sellers? Would you
: feel comfortable refusing a return under those conditions, or
: not offering a partial refund?

: In my view it was very poor form, which is why I posted the
: original warning on this thread.

: Regards,

: Tony C.

Current Position
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE