|The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998.|
A marketplace for chronographs, dive watches and other tool-type wristwatches and timepieces
Rules: Postings must be an ad announcing an intent to sell, buy or trade. Full item description and photo(s) must be posted within the message here, not as links to other websites. Links to online auctions and other sites: Links to online auctions, dealer sites or other listings of items are permitted, but you should be careful to ensure that such listings will comply with our other ChronoTrader Policies. In addition, we request that sellers linking to online auctions or listings offer some benefit or accomodation to ChronoTrader readers (for example, some discount or an undertaking to end an auction early, to keep a watch "in the family"). Photos must be of the actual item for sale in its present condition. No counterfeit or replica products. No post for the same item may be repeated within 7 days, except to lower the asking price. Commercial dealers are limited to three unique posts per day. [More...]
The watch is sold in the setup seen in the photos. I don't know if this is the original setup or not, I bought it looking like this. Obviously your watch and Amers watch have different setups as well so at least one of them is not "REAL" either? Red hands in combination with orange accents on the dial does not appear more original to me than silver hands. Your and Amers watches are hardly from the 60's as the dial design screams 70's and because the Valjoux 7733 movement was intruduced in 1969...
Claiming my watch "ISNT REAL" is a bit harsh based on the fact that two other similar watches have different setups. I'll let any potential buyer make his own mind up.
If you wish to discuss this further you are welcome to send me an email.
: I noticed your listing for this just a few minutes ago. I gotta say
: that this watch isn't real.
: Here's Amer's listing a few years back
: Amer's is one of the two known original setup for the watch. I own
: the other
: The one from Amer's listing has the same exact case as mine while
: yours is a Wakmann case which probably dates to the 70's
: (because of the inner part of the caseback - that was a later
: logo). I also don't think this was made by Wakmann. The hands on
: Amer differ from mine (its probably before or after mine - hard
: to date it).
: The hands on yours are completely wrong. The sub hands should have
: been painted to make it more visible as the sub dials itself are
: painted black. I'm sure one could make an argument that the
: steel pops out but if you look at the two, mine and Amer's, they
: are all painted either red or orange.