The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Including a photo of the piece you are talking about ALWAYS helps! You can learn how to post a photo here: How To Include Photos In Your Postings. 'For sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Links to Internet auctions are acceptable only if their purpose is to question the authenticity of a product or provide new clues for identifying counterfeit products. Links that appear to be 'shills' promoting the sale of counterfeit products will be deleted. Links to websites of sellers of counterfeit items are not permitted -- we know they are out there and do not need to be encouraging them by sending traffic to their sites. Privacy, additional policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&rd=1&item=4943403556&ssPageName=STRK:MEWN:IT
I think I may have bought the bait on this one. Received the watch and although it is good looking , I think it may be put together from various pieces. Before taking it to a specialist, I wanted to ask how I could check on my own if I bought a bastardized piece?
Details:
The crown appears new relatively new
Back is marked with "1203", but I now understand that is marking for non-chrono
Wear between pieces does not appear even
Face could be original, but appears too clear and crisp to be from the 60s
Movement is not signed "Breitling" but is likely a venus 170
In hindsight, his description of himself give me great concern
If anyone can offer advice, I would very much appreciate it.
Thanks,
Adam
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |