The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998.
Informational Websites ChronoMaddox -- the legacy of Chuck Maddox OnTheDash -- vintage Heuer website Zowie -- Omega information
Discussion Forums ChronoMaddox Forum Heuer Forum Omega Forum
Counterfeit Watchers ChronoTools Forum ChronoTrader Forum
Vintage Heuer Discussion Forum
The place for discussing 1930-1985 Heuer wristwatches, chronographs and dash-mounted timepieces. Online since May 2003.
OnTheDash Home What's New! Price Guide Chronographs Dash Mounted Collection
Did the experiment and the law is on my side *LINK*

What I say, one way or the other will not add up to a hill of beans but the laws of physics and watch making are on my side for what it's worth . I did Chuck's experiment after doing some calculations on human stride etc.. and found that I was correct. I was going to use a micro rotor but I thought it would be better to use something more modern. The Tag Heuer 2894-2 Automatic Chronograph movement. So I hope this youtube thing works .When I moved it the length of a normal stride ( on Earth not in space )it did not wind but when I moved it just a few inches it wound the movement . Here is the link http://youtube.com/watch?v=mOGI-4N_5i4 titled :Automatics work BUT NOT AS WELL in Space or how I learned to love the bomb!

Current Position
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE