The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998.
Informational Websites ChronoMaddox -- the legacy of Chuck Maddox OnTheDash -- vintage Heuer website Zowie -- Omega information
Discussion Forums ChronoMaddox Forum Heuer Forum Omega Forum
Counterfeit Watchers ChronoTools Forum ChronoTrader Forum
Vintage Heuer Discussion Forum
The place for discussing 1930-1985 Heuer wristwatches, chronographs and dash-mounted timepieces. Online since May 2003.
OnTheDash Home What's New! Price Guide Chronographs Dash Mounted Collection
510.50x crown and back

Hello everybody, after having seen both in person and in picture many examples of the 1000 series chronographs (510.500 polished, .501 black PVD etc.) I still am not able to understand whether these watches:

1- Should have a signed crown
2- Should have the "Heuer" stamp on the back cover

As said, I have seen both signed and unsigned crowns: unsigned seem to be the rule for the pewter version but no 'hard & fast rule' such as for the 510.511 & 23 Carreras seems to apply.

For the back cover, again both are to be found and I have seen both Heuer-marked backs on the 510.501.

I am also wondering whether these (lack of) signature indicates an earlier or later production run.
Maybe someone else has already pondered on this topic, but I couldn't find any hints on the OtD magnificent gallery.
Any tips?

Thanks in advance.

Fabrizio

Current Position
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE