This certainly has attracted a lot of interest and debate. I put up a brief post on Sunday about the movement and speculation. I guess the question is this: can you claim a movement is 100% designed in-house if the base movement was designed by someone else? I guess its semantics, but you can liken it to Bentley claiming design rights over the Continental, despite using a VW platform.

I think what is causing controversy is the claim of "100%"- 100% doesn't leave much room for doubt!

Anyway, looks like a nice movement and very nice of M. Babin to take the time to reply on my site and others.

Cheers