The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Vintage Heuer Discussion Forum
The place for discussing 1930-1985 Heuer wristwatches, chronographs and dash-mounted timepieces. Online since May 2003. | |||||||
| |||||||
|
Thanks for posting this one, and sending me the full SN.
Serial number database is showing that
In terms of the possible mismatch of your hands (plain steel) and dial (inserts), that's why we use the word "transitional", as Heuer may have been using up the plain hands as it transitioned to the ones with inserts. It seems that we pay far more attention to this now, than Heuer did back in the day.
Jeff
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
: This is my 1163MH with serial 2040xx, 'later' dial with the
: non-ridged markers but 'early' polished steel hands.
: The GF bracelet clasp is stamped 2/70, though I've no way of
: ascertaining if it's original to the watch.
: I've always wondered why the hands are such - according to the blog
: post below, polished hands should belong to the eariler dials
: with 'Chronomatic' or ridged markers, while dials with
: non-ridged markers should have the later hands with black insets
: - if these were sevice hands, I would have expected them to be
: of a later (Viceroy) rather than earlier style.
:
: http://www.onthedash.com/thoughts/field-guide-to-the-heuer-autavia-reference-1163-black-dial/
: Maybe mine had a service replacement dial?
: So yours, being earlier than mine, should have pre-Viceroy hands,
: thus your Viceroy hands are probably service hands?
: Just my 2 newbie cents - I'm sure the experts will soon weigh in
: with their more accurate opinions!
: ben
: Singapore
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |