When Eddie refers to "he", it's unclear whether he is talking about you [Stewart] or me [Jeff].

Jeff

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

: Yeah.. I've kept out of it.. but now statements are being made
: about my actions that are not true.
: This needs addressing....

: Eddie wrote this - I presume he is talking about me...

: "He took it to another forum and dissed me before I banned
: him, then he stole my bandwidth to further diss me"

: and " ...there was no need for the aggressive rejection of
: my watch.. " and "I pay the bills and my rules
: apply"

: 'Dissing' - Just for the record - this is absolutely not true.
: Anyone can look at the postings I made here (on OTD) and can see
: I did not say a bad word about Eddie prior to my banning. The
: time stamps can be checked. (Please don't confuse anyone elses
: posts with mine)

: 'Aggressive rejection'.. again, not true.. anyone can read that
: thread and make their own mind up.

: 'My Rules' - fair enough.. but I didn't break any of the rules.

: The funny thing is this... let's imagine for one second that Eddies
: watch is a genuine Heuer.. it would be so unbelievably rare,
: that it fooled all the Heuer enthusiasts, all the Heuer experts,
: the guys that wrote 'The History of Heuer', the head of
: watchmaking at Heuer at the time, and even Jack Heuer himself...
: this would be extremely rare.. yet the guy that it came from had
: two of them, NOS/mint too... seriously, I'm LMAO.

: Who would you believe.. Jack Heuer & Chief Heuer Watchmaker at
: the time -or- Eddies mate's mate who happened to have 2 of them?
: ;0)
: Perhaps Eddie would be willing to send it to the Vintage Dept. at
: TAG Heuer in LCDF for verification? Thought not.

: Like someone on DWC said.. easy for the owner of a forum to do/say
: what he wants for his own outcome.

: PS. At least @Tomhanx can see the truth

: Stewart
: - Heuerville