The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998.
Informational Websites ChronoMaddox -- the legacy of Chuck Maddox OnTheDash -- vintage Heuer website Zowie -- Omega information
Discussion Forums ChronoMaddox Forum Heuer Forum Omega Forum
Counterfeit Watchers ChronoTools Forum ChronoTrader Forum
Vintage Heuer Discussion Forum
The place for discussing 1930-1985 Heuer wristwatches, chronographs and dash-mounted timepieces. Online since May 2003.
OnTheDash Home What's New! Price Guide Chronographs Dash Mounted Collection
Re: Disinformation: is really a fake?

Bullitt,
My apologises.. you did ask me about this on the other thread, but I didn't reply.

I'm not overly familiar with this particular model, and haven't really followed any past discussion on the two dials.
Personally, from what I can see in the photos you provide, I would be satisfied that they are both 'good'.

The example with the thinner Heuer shield does look 'better' aesthetically, but the example with the thicker Heuer shield still looks genuine to me.
Also.. I've owned two Ref. 12's from the late 70's, and one had a thinner shield, one had a bigger, fatter shield - and there was a minor difference in positioning of the lume dots, but both were original.

Please note that I've never handled any of these L5100 Silverstones, and I'm just going by what I can see in those pics.

Stewart
- Heuerville

Current Position
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE