I think you are missing my point:

1) there is no need to do a comparison of the Carrera or the Nina just to share how good the movado is. The price point of the Carrera and the Nina only reflect the demand of this two, which both prices have appreciated into near stratosphere. So what has the current market price has any bearings to the superior quality of the Movado?

Does it just mean that the Movado should move up in prices as well just because the build and all is superior in your opinion?

Unless there is a clear motive for this; "guys, don't just buy the Nina or Carrera, the Movado should appreciate in price too (for me)"

This debate somehow reminded me of a mad man, whom insisted that his watches that are equipped with Val 72c and Valjoux 88 price point should outdo that of a Rolex Daytona Val 72 as Rolex is not able to produce a watch with Val 88. And value of his watches should surpass the madness of the Val. 72 hype.

2) if you say you are the first to discover the Nina, this is one interesting statement you are making. You are saying you're the person that discover the connection of this watch to Nina Rindt?

For the record, I had a M95 watch in the past and I do agree it is well made.

Hallo Jack,welcome back.
: Thje man behind the ''Nina Rindt''is...me.
: 5 years ago I purchased the universal Geneve Nina for 900 euros
: first exec.I am not Joking.I am the first discover.
: Then presented it in every forum.
: It is a nice watch.Now I have meet Movado m95, same
: configuration,and I feel free to say that Movado is a very high
: quality watch,and really underestimated.
: U.G. is a good watch?OK.
: I prefer 2 times Movado than a Nina.And my pocket is happy.My
: passion is more happy than my pocket.The watch is really
: superior in terms of QUALITY and ORIGINALITY.
: This is ONLY my point of you,so please...let others a space to say
: an honest opinion.
: I don't want to be a code bar.