| Informational Websites | ChronoMaddox -- the legacy of Chuck Maddox | OnTheDash -- vintage Heuer website | Zowie -- Omega information |
| Discussion Forums | ChronoMaddox Forum | Heuer Forum | Omega Forum |
| Counterfeit Watchers | ChronoTools Forum | ChronoTrader Forum |
|
|
The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | |||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
 |
Vintage Heuer Discussion Forum
The place for discussing 1930-1985 Heuer wristwatches, chronographs and dash-mounted timepieces. Online since May 2003. | ||||||
| |||||||
| |||||||
Dear Sirs!
Recently I studied at a lot of net pics of the Camaro 7220S, and all of what I have seen has longer
hands in the registers than the one given as exemplar on OTD.
Also the lume in the central minute hand of the OTD example is longer than at all the others I know.
And the sweep second hand has also a different shape at the short end.
Maybe I am to much into „correctness“ of a given piece, but I wonder if there is any explanation why the OTD exemplar is different in these 3 details to the big majority of all the others?
Here the OTD exemplar:
[URL=http://s173.photobucket.com/user/phranz2/media/Comparison%20Camaro7220S/otd_referenz_7220s_zps0e04ygyw.jpg.html]
[/URL]
Here how the others basically look:
[URL=http://s173.photobucket.com/user/phranz2/media/Comparison%20Camaro7220S/Beispiel_zpsqopziw9d.jpg.html]
[/URL]
_phranz
| Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |