The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998.
Informational Websites ChronoMaddox -- the legacy of Chuck Maddox OnTheDash -- vintage Heuer website Zowie -- Omega information
Discussion Forums ChronoMaddox Forum Heuer Forum Omega Forum
Counterfeit Watchers ChronoTools Forum ChronoTrader Forum
Vintage Heuer Discussion Forum
The place for discussing 1930-1985 Heuer wristwatches, chronographs and dash-mounted timepieces. Online since May 2003.
OnTheDash Home What's New! Price Guide Chronographs Dash Mounted Collection
Thanks Jeff!

So the opinion is that the dial left Heuer in -62 with the T-mark and that his dial, with this marking would still be accepted in a '62 case? This is what throws me off but if this is accepted for Heuers I guess there's more clarity now. :)

Or it had the T added later by Heuer at service while relumed with tritium? I can't imagine Heuer doing such sloppy relume as it now has but of course it could have been relumed more times over the years. I weren't aware of other similar cases as Paolo mentions so I guess its not likely this dial was new, with a T added, when it first was assembled later in the 60's?

Thanks guys. Appreciate the feedback. :)

Current Position
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE