The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998.
Informational Websites ChronoMaddox -- the legacy of Chuck Maddox OnTheDash -- vintage Heuer website Zowie -- Omega information
Discussion Forums ChronoMaddox Forum Heuer Forum Omega Forum
Counterfeit Watchers ChronoTools Forum ChronoTrader Forum
Vintage Heuer Discussion Forum
The place for discussing 1930-1985 Heuer wristwatches, chronographs and dash-mounted timepieces. Online since May 2003.
OnTheDash Home What's New! Price Guide Chronographs Dash Mounted Collection
Yes
In Response To: probably the same should..... ()

Yes. If you ask me, all these nicknames add some aura and desirability ("make am impression") that has nothing to do with the intrinsic value of a watch.

To me watches are watches. Some are more rare, more complicated or more beautiful (subjectively) than the others and that's it.

I think we are too old to be impressed or influenced in our judgments of a watch, by the fact that a star wore a similar model (most of the times because a sponsor asked him to do so).

So, I see no point in using nicknames. But this is just me.

Current Position
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE