The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998.
Informational Websites ChronoMaddox -- the legacy of Chuck Maddox OnTheDash -- vintage Heuer website Zowie -- Omega information
Discussion Forums ChronoMaddox Forum Heuer Forum Omega Forum
Counterfeit Watchers ChronoTools Forum ChronoTrader Forum
Vintage Heuer Discussion Forum
The place for discussing 1930-1985 Heuer wristwatches, chronographs and dash-mounted timepieces. Online since May 2003.
OnTheDash Home What's New! Price Guide Chronographs Dash Mounted Collection
You're Correct, t'was a typo, Seamaster's an 861…
In Response To: question..... ()

: first, another nod to all your effort on all
: these pics and posts...really great!

: now on to the question...the title starts out
: as a 321 seamaster then switches in the post
: to 861. i'm going to assume based on the
: pics the seamaster is a 861 version? also i
: would think the 861 movement would be a
: better contendor/comparison for the 7736
: than the 321.

: is this a simple typo from doing all these
: posts for us to enjoy, or am i missing
: something? sorry, i'm not trying to nitpick
: or anything, i just want to make sure i'm
: seeing this right? thanks in advance for any
: comments, answers, and/or insight.

You're Correct, that was a typo, Seamaster's an 861 not a c.321. I was trying to post all those pictures in a sequence and basing the next post on the previous and with this cold I'm suffering from I was bound to miss something.

Sharp eye!

-- Chuck

Messages In This Thread

Scan Day: Autavia v.7736 vs. Seamaster c.321
question.....
You're Correct, t'was a typo, Seamaster's an 861…
Current Position
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE