The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
My vintage Seamaster, which just went in for an overhaul has a stained dial, which is noticeable. The watchmaker gave me the option of leaving it as is, or sending it away for a re-dial.
My quandry is this, and ultimately the decision will be mine but I seek your opinions. Do you believe in restoration, or preservation? Should I restore this watch to it's original splendor, or leave it the way it is and preserve its years of 'character'?
Re-sell is not an issue. I plan on keeping this watch. What would "you" do? For the purpose of this discussion, my desires are irrelevant.
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |