The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
we like it! Informative and within the borders of the issue. Thank you.
Take care, New2
: Both are very durable. The quartz version is probably the
: better bet if you are rough and particularly active. But
: you would be best off to NOT wear your nice watch while
: doing particularly rough activities. Get a cheap Casio to
: wear those times.
: It is a bad idea to try to alter a watch in that way. It costs
: money, may be hard to get done (Omega will not do it),
: voids your warranty, AND dramatically reduces the value of
: the watch. You are much better off buying a model closer to
: what you want!
: The skeleton hands are pretty easy to read in the dark. But if
: they bother you, you might want to buy the Seamaster GMT
: instead or wait until early next year when the new models
: come out. There should be more options to choose from then
: that use the new dial and hands style.
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |