The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
Dear Guys,
Just quick posting to say I have tested the 3m pad on my humble but accurate Stainless Steel Seiko Chronograph - with pleasing results (now sporting a very fine "matt" brush finish).
Following the test drive of the 3M pad, I eagerly grabbed my Omega Seamaster ready for an external reno' job, when I decided I LIKED the scuffs, scratches, dents, gouges et al.
I firmly believe these marks are a road map of where I've been. It sort of adds a certain nobility and honesty to my Omega watch.
My reminder here to my Omega Brothers and Sisters (as per the many previously valuable postings on this subject) - is to PROCEED WITH EXTREME CAUTION when attempting any cosmetic adjustment to your Omega.
Like all high risk pursuits eg: selling tuppaware, cleaning a loaded rifle, setting the primer on a nuclear bomb or removing scratches from your Omega - PLEASE BE CAREFUL!.
Your Pal,
Pete.
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |