The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
: Hi guys.. I was told that the movement of Omega's latest Co
: Axiel is not Omega's own movement but modified from ETA
: 2892-A2, is this true ?
I believe your source is severely misinformed. While that is true for many other Omega movements, the Co-Axial is a very unique piece. Certainly the new escapement is totally Omega designed and made, even if it might be fitted to a ETA base. You would need to ask Omega for a definitive answer on this.
: What happen to the Omega original
: movements?? Well, I do not oppose ETA, but wouldn't it be
: nice that Omega produces their own movements.....
ETA is a different division of Omega's parent company (The Swatch Group), so ETA movements are still part of the Omega family.
I still wonder why this is an issue to people. These are huge manufacturing companies that have long ago outgrown the cute little family owned watch shop scale of doing things where that used to mean something.
Who cares if the movement is made by people whose paycheck has a different company or division name on it? Each Omega watch is built to Omega's specifications. If a different division gets better economies of scale making movements for Bancpain and others, all the better for us Omega buyers!
It is much the same as how auto manufacturers like GM and Chrysler have one division that makes the base engines for several auto lines under the parent company.
Heck, even Rolls Royce stopped making their auto engines and now buy them from BMW. They had to do that because their production volume could not support maintaining a high level of quality and innovation. Similarly, smaller, high end watchmakers cannot compete without better economies of scale.
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |