The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
The Rolex is considered to be a very good watch, in terms of mechanism quality, inhouse mvmnt, robust structure, accuracy etc..etc...
I personaly can't stand it's appearence. It looks to me as the same as many other cheap watches that imitate the rolex look which actualy hasn't been changed for decades. A simple very un sophisticated look at all.
I can't imagine myself buyng a Rolex, while IMHO, the Omegas, including SeMP, return successfuly a great fight.
It's just my feelings and opinion.
ps, that's why I own a Seamaster not a Sub.
: I am thinking of selling my SUB and buying a
: SMP
: the SUB is 1 1/2 yrs old. Any toughts
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |