The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
: Who ever said that? Mechanical watches will
: ALWAYS have small variances like that across
: different conditions and when measured over
: short periods of time.
: When a mechanical watch settles in, you will
: find that its LONG-TERM accuracy will become
: fairly consistent.
: Sounds like you are already there! Never give
: importance to 12-hour or 1-2 day
: measurements of accuracy on mechanical
: watches. Instead, always measure the
: accuracy of a mechancial watch over a period
: of at least two weeks to allow these small
: variations to average out.
: The true objective of an accurate mechanical
: watch is to stay sufficiently close to
: correct time that any variations are
: inconsequential in your life--and that's
: what your watch is already doing!
I have read on past posts that hacking your movement could be harmful to the mov't, how true is that? Is it more healthy just to use positioning to control accuracy?
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |