The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
: I have read on past posts that hacking your
: movement could be harmful to the mov't, how
: true is that? Is it more healthy just to use
: positioning to control accuracy?
Movements that do have a built-in hack feature are those that when you pull the crown all the way out to set the time, the second hand STOPS. Almost all modern mechanical watches do this. This allows you to easily synchronize the seconds with an accurate time source. This method is PERFECTLY SAFE.
It is only the vintage watches that keep running when you are setting the time that there is any concern. And that is only if you regularly use the 'hacking' technique of using back-pressure on the winding crown to force the movement to stop to allow you to resynchronize the seconds.
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |