The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
Thanks. I am looking forward to looking at these test results. So far my watch is unbelievably accurate, and I don't need this data. It is keeping +- 0.2 sec per day, better than most of my quartz watches. Yet, I am a bit concerned, that it is too accurate for being only 10 days old. I understand these watches often slow down with break-in, and I would hate having a watch that runs slow. If that should happen, perhaps the test results will give position information that might help me figure out how to compensate at night for any slowing during the day. I would imagine that if any recalibration of the watch was done after the watch was assembled, that the relative speed differences, dependent on position, would remain the same.
: Yes.
: *BUT* these are the tests done on your movement
: at the point of certification, which is well
: before the movement is assembled into a
: watch.
: Because of all the things that occur in
: assembly--sometimes including a
: recalibration--the results on the
: certificate do not necessarily reflect the
: state of the watch as it leaves the factory.
: Yet it still can be a decent indication of
: which positions it is more likely to run
: faster/slower.
: Never heard a report from someone who did their
: own COSC-type test and compared the results
: to the certificate for their watch. Would be
: interesting to see how they compare!
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |