The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
I have decided to purchase a Seamaster "Bond" after trying on numerous watches Omega GMT, Rolex Sub, GMT, etc. The only watch that even comes close in overall impression is the AP Royal Oak, but this watch is a little pricey for a everyday watch. I have always preferred autos and own a couple of JLC's which get worn very seldom. The Seamaster will be worn everyday, including during skiing, tennis, paragliding, and bar-hopping. Given these facts,would I be better off choosing the quartz modelster over the auto? Also, I have seen many auto in excess of fifty years old and they still are able to be serviced. What is the long-term (servicing)outlook for a quartz model--assuming that it isn't abused to death first?
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |