zOwie Omega Discussion Forum

Opened July 1999, zOwie is the Internet's first and longest running discussion forum dedicated to Omega brand watches.

Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.

For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega.

Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings.

To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately.

Forgot your Password? RSS

Return to Index Read Responses

Okay, I think I'm onto something...

In Response To: Sorry, I just don't know (or care) >> ()

If you neiter care nor know, I don't think the number of links has changed.

So what's left then, since I think we can safely assume that your watchmaker hasn't done anything to the links themselves? Right, the distribution of the links on the bracelet.

In the "tight" configuration, I originally had two full removable links on each side of the clasp and now have changed that to have one on the side where the deployant part folds out and three on the side where the diving extension folds out. Looks slightly better now. The watch is no longer so tight that it's locked in place, it has a tiny bit of slack, but it will not slide anywhere.

I'd like to see how this turns out and have decided to give the bracelet another try.

-hacmac