The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
I know this message will angry some Omega fans, but when I compare a Quartz Seamaster 2541.80 to an Auto version 2531.80 I find:
1. Both look physically the same (unless someone really notices the chronometer word missing on your watch dial)
2. Bracelets are the same
3. Both have the same water resistance
4. Quartz is less heavy and less expensive than Auto version (25% less)
5. Quartz is more accurate on time
6. Quartz doesn't need winding or shaking evey day
7. Quartz is better shock proof
8. Quartz will cost you a new battery every 3 years, but who cares?
9. Quartz does not produce funny noise when shaked
10. Quartz has less moving parts, and less mechanical parts, or less wear.
Wonder why they call it the cheap version?
Please don't get frustrated about this.
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |