The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
: Who calls it that?
: While everything you say is true, there are
: completely different reasons for liking a
: mechanical watch instead. Practicality is
: not one of them. Mechanical watches are less
: practical and less convenient in several
: ways.
: But so is a rowboat compared to a powerboat, or
: a bicycle compared to a car, or a painting
: compared to a photograph. In each case, one
: is clearly the more efficient method of
: achieving the end. But the older, quainter,
: less efficient methods can can provide a
: more meaningful journey to the same or
: similar objective.
: For those that desire deeper meaning and
: significance over simple efficiencies, the
: less efficient route can be an overall
: better choice.
Very eloquently said derek!
Kelvin
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |