The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
Exactly... The entire world seems to run on +/- 1 to 5 MINUTES from actual time.
The entire PRESENCE of a second hand on a watch gives NEEDLESS awareness and perceived importance to the concept of time accuracies of less than one minute.
I went for several years wearing a Breitling Aerospace--a watch with high accuracy, but no second hand. The seconds display was one of several modes on the lower LCD display and I kept that switched to show date instead. During that time, I learned that a second hand was completely unnecessary in daily use. The rare times I needed the seconds were for setting the watch and when using the chronograph.
The only other common use for a seconds hand is to quickly verify that the watch is actually running.
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |