The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
If your talking about the 321 and 861 movements, they both passed NASA's stringent tests. The 863, same as the 861 movement but only different is the 863 has a metal lever for stopping the chronograph function. I do believe however that the geneva waves are decorated on the 863 for presentation purposes. The latter I am not too sure but the former I am. Please correct me if I'm wrong, thanks! Warm regards, Louis
: Talking about toughness, there would be interesting to know if the
: replacement of the castle wheel by the shuttle/cam Omega did in the
: sixties (for saving reasons), affected the movement's reliability.
: Someone out there to comment this issue?
: Oh! lovely forum, I feel here like home!
: Best regards.
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |