The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
That's a very interesting point you bring up. I haven't thought of that. Are the quartz watches as durable as the mechanical ones? You see we've saved up for this one and aren't probably going to buy another in a long time. Anyway, thanks for the advise.
: I have no personal experience of either of
: these models, but I believe their movements
: are automatic. The general feeling on the TZ
: Forum seems to point to quartz movements
: being better for our lady friends - unless
: they are watch enthusiasts. Recently someone
: said his girl friend got irritated by
: finding her watch had stopped whenever she
: ceased wearing it for a few days!
: Understandable, perhaps.
: The 1592 and 1292 are handsome looking watches,
: aren't they!
: Derek
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |