The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998.
Informational Websites ChronoMaddox -- the legacy of Chuck Maddox OnTheDash -- vintage Heuer website Zowie -- Omega information
Discussion Forums ChronoMaddox Forum Heuer Forum Omega Forum
Counterfeit Watchers ChronoTools Forum ChronoTrader Forum

zOwie Omega Discussion Forum

Opened July 1999, zOwie is the Internet's first and longest running discussion forum dedicated to Omega brand watches.

Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.

For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately.

You missed completely...

: When Pentium
: processors came out, we all swapped in our
: 486's because better (faster) technology was
: available. The same should apply to every
: other tool we own including our Omegas (or

First, you seem to be pretty uniformed about the technology. In one article of mine, I published long list of superior new technologies that virtually nobody uses. Here are just some of them: Video Hi8/SVHS against regular VHS, HDTV against regular TV, Mini Disc and DAT against regular Cassete tape, Digital TV against regular TV.

Second, it is completely false to compare watch and computer. I can not use computer longer than some 5 years (I am computer expert by profession) because it is ELECTRONIC and can not last 50 years.

As for other modern things, yes, I just like to wear plastic (synthetic) shirt, trousers and shoes. I will trow away this moment all my leather, cotton and woolen stuff :) Some other comparisons were lined out in one other answer.

: There are articles here on this site that
: attest to the superior performance of even
: the cheapest quartz movement over automatic

Depends how you read them :) If you know more, you wolud not say this as an absolute statement.

: month now it is clear that my quartz keeps
: far more accurate time than the automatic
: versions owned by my friends. During the
: month - my quartz model lost a total of 1.5
: seconds. That is phenominal.

Ar you sure? I set my (non chronometer) Omega triple date to the correct time almost three months ago. At the moment, it is at +1,5 seconds from the time set almost three months ago! Actually, that is bad result, since it is normally between +1 and -1 secs from this set time on most days. Your quartz will be 5 seconds off in 3 months :) So, what was that about the acuracy?

: ...since Omega didn't need to send the
: quartz movement out for certification - the
: watch costs less. You will save anywhere
: from $200 to $500 (US) depending on the

Woow, what a mistake. You obviously do not realize that the "movement" in your Omega Qartz costs about few Euros to produce? And is completely and automatically produced by machine without human touching it ever in its's life? Good mehanical movement costs much more to produce (not nearly as much as it is sold for) and on most better and more complicated variants it requires man hand work to finish and assemble.

But, at the end, it all boils down to: do you like high quality, man made things with the soul, or electronis made in Taiwan (or maybe in Switzerland). Tell me, please, how many Quartz watches do you (or anyone who you know) have that are 20+ years old?

Certanly, most people buy 10 Euros cheap Quartz watches. And that is perfectly normal and OK. They just do not interested in them. When they buy wine, they will also pick last year wine for 1-2 Euros a bottle, and often buy wine in a carton.

I would not expect them to understand how can I drink my wine from 1993. and 1995, while botles from 1998. are waiting in my cellar until they are at least 7 years old :), and I did not even buy wine from 2000 yet! Does that mean I am wrong to drink 10 yeras old wine? Or just that I have different taste and different set of values? One that understands some area, tends to buy products of higher quality.

Messages In This Thread

Chronometer Chroshmometer - Quartz Is Superior
There is just something sexy about automatics that
Re: There is just something sexy about automatics
Re: There is just something sexy about automatics
I believe that text is from the Watchtime article
Well in response to that....
Re: Chronometer Chroshmometer - Quartz Is Superior
Re: Chronometer Chroshmometer - Quartz Is Superior
Far out, man! This whole thread is too heavy. *NM*
HERE ARE THE ACTUAL PUBLISHED SPECIFICATIONS
Re: Chronometer Chroshmometer - Quartz Is Superior
Quartz "accuracy" = old wives' tales.
Breitling quartz is Chronometer certified
Yep, almost all watches are machine assembled... *LINK*
Re: Breitling quartz is Chronometer certified
Re: Breitling quartz is Chronometer certified
All Breitlings are COSC in last 2-3 years *NM*
Re: Breitling quartz is Chronometer certified
Re: Breitling quartz is Chronometer certified
Re: Quartz "accuracy" = old wives' tales.
Good one for posting the exact same thing...
Re: Good one for posting the exact same thing...
Point taken. nt *NM*
Re: Quartz "accuracy" = old wives' tales.
Nup, it's about that smooth seconds hand
The Fact That Automatic Owners Avoid
Rolex 'DOES' make a quartz movement! *NM*
The Fact That Some Quartz Owners Avoid
Re: The Fact That Some Quartz Owners Avoid
Re: The Fact That Automatic Owners Avoid
I just like to hear the ticking
A new twist! I'm disappointed an Omega owner >>>
Re: A new twist! I'm disappointed an Omega owner >
You missed completely...
Re: Chronometer Chroshmometer - Quartz Is Superior
Re: Chronometer Chroshmometer - Quartz Is Superior
Quartz is logically superior, yes. So what?
Re: Chronometer Chroshmometer - Quartz Is Superior
Re: Chronometer Chroshmometer - Quartz Is Superior
Re: Chronometer Chroshmometer - Quartz Is Superior
I think you've missed the point alltogether
You "gave" the T-Touch away you..you...you...!!! *NM*
This is the difference *NM* *PIC*
Wow !!! - NICE BATTERY !! Made in Indonesia too !
Re: This is the difference
Nah, it's Timex *NM*
Re: Nah, it's Timex
Sorry, I don't own any Omega Quartz
Re: Sorry, I don't own any Omega Quartz
Dude, That's Heavy
Re: Dude, That's Heavy
Re: Dude, That's Heavy
Re: Dude, That's Heavy
Re: Chronometer Chroshmometer - Quartz Is Superior
Re: Chronometer Chroshmometer - Quartz Is Superior
Current Position
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE