The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
: movements, both unique, extremely well made
: and supposedly far more accurate than the
: run of the mill ETA quartz that everyone
: under the sun is using.
OK, but how does this difer from the run of the mill ETA automatic movement that everyone is using, including Omega? You did know that the ETA mechanical movements that are built into Omegas are also the same ETA mechanical movements that are build into Swiss FAKE Rolex replicas, American Hamiltons, and practically every other "run of the mill" watchmaker's product aren't you? It's the same exact movement minus the cost of having it certified. So, how does this differ in any significant way from the "run of the mill" ETA quartz movement that goes into the Omega Quartz models.
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |