The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
Both are great watches. You need to decide which features you would rather have. On one hand, you have a movable, sporty bezel and a solid clasp. On the other hand, the AT has a beautiful dial w/ applied markers, stylish bracelet and an understated elegance. The clasp is the weakest point. Both watches are equally versitile, suit or jeans or shorts.
If I had to choose only one, I'm not sure I could. Both have great features, but my ideal Omega would include features from both models.
Bottom line, see them both in person. Examine them and try them on. Go with the one that you like the best and wear it with pride.
If you are debating, chances are that this won't be your last watch so don't make the choice too difficult!
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |