The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
: I like the blue look of the 2531.80.00 and
This one is what I've worn for the past 5 years and couldn't be happier.
: 2551.80.00 but isn't the mid size 2052.50.00
: black more elegant and sporty at the same
More elegant? With those extremely bold bezel numbers and dial markings, it really is *less* dressy than the 2531.80.
Also, depending how tall you are, the mid-size might look a wee bit small on you. I am 6' tall but with skinny wrists, yet the full size works great on me.
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |