The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
My wife has such a "super accurate" Quartz Seamaster. According to Omega, a Quartz may do -0.3/+0.4 per day, which my wife's watch makes full use of by gaining almost 3 seconds a week. This amounts to a whopping minute of gain between DST resets, and to add insult to injury, the watch has quick-set hours and wouldn't normally need to be hacked at all.
As per Omega's specification, this is how much you can expect from a Quartz watch. They have offered to have it checked in Bienne, though. I'll make use of this now as soon as I've found the time to accomodate my wife to a spare Automatic watch from me. :-)
However, what I'm trying to say is: Quartz isn't "super accurate", it's just less inaccurate than Automatic.
-hacmac
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |