The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
This has been discussed elsewhere, so forgive me if I'm going over old ground. Quartz watches are very precise. I have a Tag with an Eta 251.262 in it, and it keeps phenominal time...maybe gains a second every two weeks. It will always gain a second every two weeks. That's precision. In a year, I can bet money it'll be 36 seconds fast. My Seamaster GMT picks up maybe a second a day if I sleep with it on, but if I set it on the nightstand crown-down it loses two. Thus, I can't say after a year it'll be 365 seconds fast. It might very well be closer to "on time" than the highly precise quartz. That's accuracy.
I'm a television news cameraman, so in my business a second counts. Both watches, quartz and auto, give me a reliable time check within their very different parameters.
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |