The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
: Does that usually depend on the movement?
It ALWAYS depends on the movment -- that's where the date change mechanism exists! Each movement design may choose to implement the features or not based on the needs for size, complexity versus simplicity, cost, and room for other complications.
: Does each watch company have a "preference"?
: My AT has both of those - I was just curious.
While I'm sure most companies prefer to include these features, there are certain tradeoffs within the design of each movement.
For example, the Seamaster GMT is based on the same movement as the regular SMP. Yet the regular SMP has rapid date set and the GMT doesn't. They had to sacrifice the crown position ususally used for setting the date to operate the GMT function.
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |