zOwie Omega Discussion Forum

Opened July 1999, zOwie is the Internet's first and longest running discussion forum dedicated to Omega brand watches.

Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.

For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega.

Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings.

To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately.

Forgot your Password? RSS

Return to Index Read Responses

Re: Cal. 1861 v. 1863?

In Response To: Cal. 1861 v. 1863? ()

From what I understand, Omega replaced a component in the 1861 with a plastic/synthetic piece for less friction, longer wear, and better performance. This component was replaced by the metal one in the 1863 because Omega did not want the plastic piece to be seen through the display back. Other than that I think the two movements are identical.

: Will someone please tell me the difference
: between these two Speedy movements and their
: respective pros & cons. Is one any
: better/prefereable to the other?

: Thanks,
: JB

Messages In This Thread

Cal. 1861 v. 1863?

Re: Cal. 1861 v. 1863?

Forgot your Password? RSS

Return to Index Read Responses

0 wallclock secs ( 0.13 usr + 0.01 sys = 0.14 CPU)