The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
Agreed with most points above.
It is really up to you and what 'smiles' at you the most.
I own an AT and a Deville. The deville smiles at me FAR MORE than the AT. I find the AT just too 'normal' looking of a watch. The Deville is thick, yet very classy looking. I especially like the Power Reserve as it has an almost L&S look about it (I am not deluding myself, it is denfinitely not a Lange, but it does hint)
I find the AT looks more like a rolex EXP and I have always found them very plain. The sapphire caseback is nice, but looses its wow factor when you realise everyone is looking at you like some kind of loon because you keep taking off your watch to admire the movement.
If you want rugged, WR, etc then go for AT on bracelet. But if it is to wear with the Armani suits, DeVille all the way.
cc
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |