zOwie Omega Discussion Forum

Opened July 1999, zOwie is the Internet's first and longest running discussion forum dedicated to Omega brand watches.

Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.

For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega.

Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings.

To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately.

Forgot your Password? RSS

Return to Index Read Responses

Go For Full!

In Response To: Seamaster Pro full vs mid size: advice needed ()

Hi,

I have had the same dilemma about 2 month ago. I finally went with the full size. I am soooooo glad I did so. One of my friend has a 4 year old midsize, and it look now too small for me, after wearing my full size for about a month. I am only 140 lbs, and 6 feet tall, so I think it is not the wrist size, buit the height that should determine the size...or even better: your taste. You said you feel to go with full size, I say do so. After all, If you buy a 1400$ watch it is your taste that counts the most. Anyway, sport watches are always bigger is size. So: Go for full! Any more questions?