The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
I've got to disagree. I've got a mid SMP and a full sized GMT and a Speedy Pro. My wrist is 6 inches. My mid never seems too small. The mid is I think about perfect. We've been conditioned over the last several years to wear huge watches. The Sub is just right. It's between a mid and full sized SMP. I wish Omega mad a SMP between the two sizes. As they don't I have both because neither one is optimal in my opinion. I have some huge watches and some tiny ones and like them all. I do not like the mid Bond SMP only because the proportions seem wrong to me. The minute hand looks too small to me. On the black version the proportions look equil to the full size.
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |