![]() |
The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | |||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
: excellent choice!!! this is a really great
: watch. elegant yet sporty and different from
: the rolex sub. why not get an automatic?
Beacouse I really don't understand the arguments for buying an automatic... I like the fact that the quartz is exact and can stand tougher activities than the automatic. Just the "feeling" and the movement of the second hand just isn't enough for the extra money in my opinion... And why can it not be considered "classy" with a quartz? I know for a fact that Omega uses wery high quality movements in their quartz-models. Doesn't that count for something? I don't want to spend more money on something that is less acurate...
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |