The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
Keith,
I know that you are very knowledgeable with the omega brand, but don't you think that this move of omega removing the bond bracelet from all other smp's (except for the bond model) is not a so smart move???
the seamaster became ever so popular because of its unique bracelet look. this is what makes it different from the other fine brands (especially the rolex sub) . in this day and age identity is what counts the most.
by changing the bracelet of the seamaster , in my own personal opinion, the seamaster is going to lose its very distinct look and would start to look again like the rolex sub. which i believe the seamaster will certainly lose its premium.
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |