The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
I was just thinking. I love Omegas, mostly for the looks and the feeling to wear them. But if you were to pick the ultimate watch in function and reability, what would it be then? Propably a quartz, more exact and can handle a rough treatment. The watch also should be light but also strong. You propably want it to be waterproof, and of course you don't want to spend to much money on it. All of these things considered, I guess a Casio G-shock is a good choise. Cheap, exact, strong, waterproof, light... Ugly, maby. Without a soul, no doubt about that....
I just bought a SMP black. So expensive I have to pay for an insurance, not very fragile, but the fact that it's so expensive makes me treat it like a baby. Not very exact as it is an automatic. You should take it of then you play golf and do other tuffer activities. It cost 17 times as much as the Casio...
Strange world.
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |