The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
: Even though you can, I would not manually wind
: an automatic watch. At issue is wear and tear
: on some internal parts.
He wasn't talking about an automatic. The Speedmaster Professional is a manual-wind ONLY watch.
But I do not see the amount of manual winding a person could possibly do would ever create a sufficient amount of 'wear and tear' to be of concern. I see a lot of this kind of severe overthinking of theoretically possible problems. Wristwatches have been manually wound for over 100 years and if that was a problem, the designs would have evolved so that it wasn't. When you have the balance wheel moving 691,200 times a day with minimal wear, do you really think 20-40 turns of the crown a day is going to be a wear issue?
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |