The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998.
Informational Websites ChronoMaddox -- the legacy of Chuck Maddox OnTheDash -- vintage Heuer website Zowie -- Omega information
Discussion Forums ChronoMaddox Forum Heuer Forum Omega Forum
Counterfeit Watchers ChronoTools Forum ChronoTrader Forum

zOwie Omega Discussion Forum

Opened July 1999, zOwie is the Internet's first and longest running discussion forum dedicated to Omega brand watches.

Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.

For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately.

Re: I have 4 Seamaster 120M quartz watches

: I must really like them! After years of
: collecting Rolex watches (at least 10 or so
: I have bought and sold), I no longer have
: any. I have found Omega to be a better buy,
: and their quality to be just as good, not as
: good, or better depending upon which area.
: (eg better bracelets for Omega, better dials
: for Rolex). I now collect Omega,
: specifically I have 4 Omega 120m
: quartz(1990's models with straight hands,
: not skeleton), and an Omega midsize blk/blk
: SMP, also quartz.

: I did like the Rolex models I had (SUB, SD,
: Datejust, etc), but I found they were off
: 4-6 seconds a day. Even though it was within
: COSC specs, it really bugged me, since I
: like to have more accurate time (if you miss
: the first 10 seconds of CSI sometimes you
: miss too much).

: There has been much written about Automatic vs.
: Quartz, so I won't get into it, but quartz
: is the right choice for me. With my
: automatics, if I didn't wear them or put
: them on the winder, I had to reset them, and
: unscrewing the crown that often is never a
: good thing from a wear and tear point of
: view.

: One distinct advantage of the Seamaster quartz
: that I find to be a BIG advantage over the
: automatic is that you can move the hour hand
: without moving the minute hand or upsetting
: the second hand. This is VERY helpful for
: time zone changes, and daylight savings,
: without having to re-sync. The quartz is
: also a tad more resistant to shock, and I
: really tend to do everything with my
: watches, and don't want the added worry of
: harmoing the movement.

: Finally, a battery change is all a quartz watch
: really needs every 3-4 years. I can do it
: myself, and it only cost $1 for the battery!
: Thanks for your E.Mail. Iv'e never managed to own a Rolex, so can't compare.I agree, I don't see the point of spending good money on an auto if the timekeeping is not good.You may as well go and buy a Swatch watch.A quartz also avoids those regular expensive services. You'll have to let me know where to source those $1 batteries, not hat I'll need one for about three years. Regards, Vince

Current Position
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE