zOwie Omega Discussion Forum

Opened July 1999, zOwie is the Internet's first and longest running discussion forum dedicated to Omega brand watches.

Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.

For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega.

Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings.

To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately.

Forgot your Password? RSS

Return to Index Read Responses

Re: Omega Vs. Rolex

In Response To: Omega Vs. Rolex ()

This is a classic post in which I call..."Justification for my purchase"...this guy spent $4000.00 and now to make himself feel good about it he has to attack the nearest competitor....very sad indeed....

JimC

: The following is a post from the Rolex timezone
: forum. I'm curious if anyone here has
: anything to say about it...

: The Rolex Submariner is more robust than the
: Omega Seamaster.

: The Rolex is constructed in Switzerland of high
: grade industrial grade stainless steel. The
: bracelet utilizes screws for sturdiness and
: functionality. The crystal is high grade
: synthetic sapphire. The movement is produced
: by Rolex and is designed for the types of
: scenarios a watch of this purpose could
: encounter. The Rolex is designed down to the
: smallest part to be durable,
: dependable,functional and repairable. The
: sub/dweller is the ultimate hard use watch.

: The Omega Seamaster is a nice watch, but it
: isn't designed to be tough. It is a
: collection of nice "parts" that
: make a nice watch. The movement is not
: "job specific". It is an ETA
: movement with modifications to
: "fit" the Omega. It was not
: designed for the Seamaster, it is used
: "in" the Seamaster. IMHO, this is
: a huge compromise on the part of Omega.

: The construction of the Omega is lower grade
: than the Rolex. The Omega uses lower grade
: steel that is softer and easier to corrode
: and mar. The bracelet is constructed with
: friction pins that are weaker and are not as
: functional as the screws used in the Rolex
: bracelet.

: Omegas parts are mostly sourced from different
: suppliers, who happen to be the lowest
: bidder.

: Are they poor quality parts? Of course not...
: Are they Rolex quality? No, but the Omega
: costs half of a Rolex for this reason.

: The Seamaster is a nice watch, but it isn't as
: robust as the Submariner.