The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
You failed to take note how Derek said that the $3995 Omega is a special case, not the usual. Why didn't you mention how Derek said the Omegas that apply in this situation are in the $2700 price range? HMMMMM? Could it be you don't want to face the truth? And the truth is that you are completely ignoring the Aqua Terra, which is the REAL watch to be compared to the Rolex DateJust. Anyone who chooses to compare the DateJust to the DeVille is purposely TRYING to make Omega look more expensive. A reasonable person knows to compare the DateJust to the AQUA TERRA, NOT the DeVille. The DeVille is finished much more highly than the DateJust. PLUS the DateJust doesn't have anything as new and revolutionary as the Co-axial movement, so it doesn't deserve to be priced as high as the Co-axial watches.
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |