The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
: The Aqua Terras wear larger than their stated
: size suggests.
I agree! I tried a 38 mm on, but I could not (yet) make up my mind, because it felt large. But it IS a beauty. And looks much better in person than on the Omega website! Everyone tells me that I'll get used to the size. It is difficult to believe, but I can't argue with the consensus here...
: you will find it's about the same size
: as the Speedmaster Pro.
I think I felt the Speedmaster Pro was heavier and thicker, if I remember correctly.
: But I still vote for the Aqua Terra, wheather
: it's the 35mm or 38mm.
Yeah, I am leaning there, too... It is definitely growing on me :-) I wish I could try on a 35 mm Aqua Terra. I think I would love the 38 mm, but it would be nice to have a comparison. The auth. dealers don't seem to have the 35 mm anywhere in Mass.
-A
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |