zOwie Omega Discussion Forum

Opened July 1999, zOwie is the Internet's first and longest running discussion forum dedicated to Omega brand watches.

Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.

For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega.

Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings.

To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately.

Forgot your Password? RSS

Return to Index Read Responses

Re: Thickness of SMP Chronograph

In Response To: Thickness of SMP Chronograph ()

At first I had the Seamaster Pro (James Bond), but then I traded up for the chronograph version. Both watches are great, but I just liked the chronograph version better.

In terms of the chronograph being too thick or cumbersome, I've never experienced any problems with this watch or had any regrets about buying it. It is much thicker than the Seamaster Pro, but it actually fits my wrist better (and I got a small wrist). That's because the lugs curve downward a lot more and that keeps the watch centered on my wrist. As a result, the watch does not slide up and down my wrist as much. I've had this watch for 4 months now and the watch is still in pristine condition (amazingly there are no scratches on it).

Messages In This Thread

Thickness of SMP Chronograph

Re: Thickness of SMP Chronograph

Forgot your Password? RSS

Return to Index Read Responses

0 wallclock secs ( 0.18 usr + 0.03 sys = 0.21 CPU)